The court issued an order directing the amendment of a prior judgment clarifying the testamentary suit cross-reference and instructing parties to amend consent terms to include a specific summons reference across two different testamentary petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mugdha
2-TS 51-17 in TP 158-09.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.51 OF 2017
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.158 OF 2009
Sushila Vitthalrao Hande...Deceased
Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande...Petitioner
Vs.
Alka Ramesh Sharma alias Alka Vitthalrao Hande
& Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Viraj Jadhav i/by Mr. Nachiket V. Khaladkar for Petitioner.
Mr. Asutosh Shukla for Defendant No.1.
Mr. Nikhil Adkine for Defendant Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATE : 31 MARCH 2021
P.C. :
1.The following words shall be added in the 4th sentence of
paragraph No.2 of the order dated 3 November 2017 after the words ‘taken
on record’ and before the comma :
“in Testamentary Suit No.51 of 2017”.
2.The consent terms to be amended by the parties by including
the reference to the Chamber Summons (L) No.197 of 2017 in
Testamentary Suit No.237 of 2015 in Petition No.377 of 2010. The
amendment shall be signed by the advocates.
( S.C. GUPTE, J. )
1 / 1
Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande
Alka Ramesh Sharma alias Alka Vitthalrao Hande
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court