Disposed

commissionmer of sales tax,mum v. m/s b. vijaykumar and Co.

Bombay HC21 Mar 2017STR/24/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a sales tax reference, the High Court, referring to a Supreme Court decision, held that the tender of import licenses constitutes a sale of goods and the premium payable is exigible to sales tax.

What did the court decide?

The reference question was answered by relying on the Supreme Court's judgment in favor of the dealer/respondent, deciding the matter accordingly.

commissionmer of sales tax,mum Vs m/s b. vijaykumar and… — Specific Performance | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

901-STR-24.2009.doc

¶2

suresh

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

SALES TAX REFERENCE NO.24 OF 2009 IN REFERENCE APPLICATION NO.16 OF 2003

¶5

The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, Mumbai .... Applicant Vs. M/s. B. Vijaykumar & Co. .... Respondent

¶6

Mr. Dushyant Kumar, AGP, for the Applicant-State. Ms Nikita Badheka for the Respondent.

¶7

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

¶8

DATE : MARCH 21, 2017

¶9

P.C:

¶10

The Tribunal has referred the following question of

¶11

law for answer and opinion of this Court:-

¶12

" Whether the tender of an import licenses called REP licenses/Exim Scrips by the holder thereof after discontinuance of Import Export Policy since 1.3.1992 to the branches of the state Bank of India designated for the purpose at the instance of Reserve Bank of India for forwarding to the offices of the Joint Chief Controller of Imports & Exports on certain amount of

¶13

suresh

¶14

901-STR-24.2009.doc

¶15

premium proportionate to balance of C.I.F. Value constitute a sale of goods within the meaning and for the purpose of Bombay Sales Tax and whether the amount of premium is exigible to sales tax?"

¶16

This question arose out of the Tribunal's order which was passed in an appeal. That appeal was directed against the order of the First Appellate Authority. The Tribunal has referred that question arising out of its order dated 31-12-2002.

¶17

However, when the reference was called out, it is fairly conceded that similar issue was dealt with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No.1798 of 2005 ( Commercial Tax Officer & Ors. Vs. State Bank of India & Anr. ), decided on 8-11-2016. The question of law has been answered. It has been answered in favour of the dealer, namely, the respondent before us. It has been answered against the Revenue. In these circumstances, this reference is also answered accordingly, and is disposed of.

¶18

(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶19

Page 2 of 2

commissionmer of sales tax,mum v. m/s b. vijaykumar and Co.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

commissionmer of sales tax,mum v. m/s b. vijaykumar and Co.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Commissioner of Income Tax 25 Vs K. N. Shaikh

Commissioner of Income Tax 25 Vs K. N. Shaikh

Commissioner of Income Tax 25 Vs K. N. Shaikh

the commissioner of Sales Tax,Mum Vs M/s shri datta shetkari saahakari sakhar karkhana limited

m/s sunstar finance and leasing Ltd. Vs the commissioner of sals tax

The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai Vs Sunil Haribhau Pote