Civil Appeal No. 44 of 1992 and accompanying Civil Application were dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's absence at the hearing.
Appeal dismissed and Civil Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sa44-92.doc
1/2
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO.44 OF 1992 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1335 OF 1993
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.44 OF 1992
Smt. Shevantibai Bhika Karpe (Teli) …Appellant (Ori. Plaintiff)
vs.
Smt. Vithabai Gopal Karpe (Teli)& Ors.
…Respondents (Ori. Defendants)
None for the Appellant.
Ms. R.M. Khairnar, i/b. P.N. Joshi, for Respondent No.3(a).
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATED : 12 JANUARY 2017
P.C. :
. This appeal was called out in the morning session. Since none appeared for the parties, it was kept back. When it is called out in the afternoon session, Respondent No.3 appears through Counsel. The Appellant is absent. This Court has been notifying a weekly board of hearing matters, making it clear by a notice put up on the board that no adjournment would be granted in final hearing matters appearing on the weekly board on any ground. The rationale of this notice is that these matters are very old and have been pending for a very long time, some even from 1992. This Second Appeal has been pending since 1992. I am
sa44-92.doc
2/2
sg
not inclined to adjourn the matter any further. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
( S.C. GUPTE, J. )
Smt. Shevantibai Bhika Karpe (Teli)
Smt. Vithabai Gopal Karpe (Teli) & Ors.
S.C. GUPTA, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
