Review petition seeking review of order allowing writ petition and condoning delay was rejected as no cogent grounds for review were made out. Appeal stayed pending review outcome.
Review petition rejected; appeal stayed pending review disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 2 RPW 92-16 in WP 7785-13.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO. 92 OF 2016
Adam Ghudu Bandar & Ors. .. Petitioners / Ori. Respdts. Vs Shamshuddin Abbas Pattekari & Ors. .. Respondents
In
WRIT PETITION NO. 7785 OF 2013
Shri Shamshuddin Abbas Pattekari .. Petitioner Vs
The President / Secretary, Deshbhakt Padmanshree Ratnappa Kumbhar Education Society, Kolhapur & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Rajiv Chavan, Senior Advocate a/w Priyanka Chavan i/b Dhairyasheel Sutar, for Petitioners.
Mr.Meelan Topkar, for Respondents.
Coram : N.M.Jamdar, J. Date : 25 July 2017.
P.C. :
By this Review petition, the order dated 18 December 2015, allowing the Writ petition filed by Respondent No.1-original Petitioner, is sought to be reviewed. By this order the application for condonation of delay, which was rejected by the School Tribunal, was allowed subject to the original Petitioner paying the cost of Rs.10,000/-. Further directions were also issued considering the
2 2 RPW 92-16 in WP 7785-13.doc
factum of delay.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the rejection of the review petition on grounds of no cogent reason requires reconsideration.
Adam Ghudu Bandar & Ors.
Shamshuddin Abbas Pattekari & Ors.
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
