Vaibhav Sharad Patil Vs University of Mumbai and Anr.

. Heard the Applicant and learned counsel for the Respondent-University on the Civil Application seeking condonation of delay in filing the Review Petition. The delay is of 142 days.

¶16

For the reasons mentioned in the Civil Application, the delay is condoned. Accordingly, the Civil Application stands disposed of.

¶17

1/2

¶18

Vishal Parekar

¶19

chamber-902-cao-128-2017.doc

¶20

We have also heard the Applicant and learned counsel

¶21

for the Respondent-University on the Review Petition.

¶22

Having considered the submissions made by the Applicant, we are of the view that no case is made out to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court to review the order passed by this Court on 4^th October, 2016. It is well settled that the scope of review jurisdiction is extremely limited and unless the case to that effect is made out the Court cannot review the order. We do not find any error in the order warranting invocation of review jurisdiction.

¶23

As a result, the Review Petition deserves to be and is

¶24

hereby dismissed.

¶25

(MAKARAND S. KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

¶26

2/2

¶27

Vishal Parekar

Vaibhav Sharad Patil v. University of Mumbai and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vaibhav Sharad Patil v. University of Mumbai and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. J. J. Magdum Trust and Anr. Vs Shri. Kishor Balasaheb Bhagate

Dr. J. J. Magdum Trust and Anr. Vs Shri. Shankar Chanabasappa Chillalshetti

Dr. J. J. Magdum Trust and Anr. Vs Shri. Kishor Balasaheb Bhagate

Mauli Sai Developers Private Limited and Anr. Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 6 Ors.

University of Mumbai through the Registrar Vs Niranjani Kisan Koli and Anr.

University of Mumbai through the Registrar Vs Niranjani Kisan Koli and Anr.