The Bombay HC dismissed a review petition filed by shop owners aggrieved by a prior writ order allowing partial demolition of a building. The court found no justifiable ground for review.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1-os-rpwl-15-17
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 15 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2934 OF 2016
.. Petitioners
Vs.
Mr. Shailendra Kanetkar for petitioners. Mr. Sukanta Karmakar, AGP for State. Ms. Pallavi Thakar for MCGM.
Mr. Shailendra Singh for respondent no.4.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & M. S. KARNIK,JJ.
APRIL 27, 2017.
P.C.
1. It is contended that the Review Petitioners are occupants of the
shops situated on the ground floor of the subject building. They had
entered into an agreement with the landlord. Both, the landlord and the petitioners-tenants agree that ground floor portion of the building need not
2
1-os-rpwl-15-17
be demolished, while upper portion of the building being dilapidated could be demolished.
was pronounced on 10/3/2017 and thereafter consequent steps were taken by the Corporation. Learned counsel opposes the prayer made by the review petitioners.
3
1-os-rpwl-15-17
such request was made to the court.
5. Review Petition is accordingly dismissed.
(M. S. KARNIK,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)
Bhamini G. Keni and ors.
State of Maharashtra and ors.
NARESH H. PATIL
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
