A criminal revision application under Special Case No. 21 of 2005 was allowed to be withdrawn by the court upon representation from the applicants that they had been acquitted and the application would not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.revn-9.16.doc
sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.9 OF 2016
IN
SPECIAL CASE NO.21 OF 2005
Chandulal Lalchand Thadani & Anr. … Applicants vs. The State & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Kripashankar Pandey h/f Ms. Mrunmai Kulkarni for the Applicants. Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkarfor the Respondent.
CORAM : A.K. MENON, J.
DATE : 7 th JUNE, 2017
P.C.
1/1
Chandulal Lalchand Thadani & Anr.
The State & Anr.
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
