This review application was rejected by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, as no error was apparent on the face of the record. Consequently, pending civil applications were also disposed of.
Review application rejected; pending civil applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ra238.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
REVIEW APPLICATION NO.238 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1309 OF 2014 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15596 OF 2016
AND
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15600 OF 2016
(IN REVIEW APPLICATION NO.238 OF 2016)
The Chief Executive Officer,
Zilla Parishad, Beed
...APPLICANT
VERSUS
Balaji s/o Vithalrao Savalkar
and others.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.P.D. Suryawanshi Advocate for Applicant.
Mr.S.G. Karlekar, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 2 & 3.
...
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2017
ORDER :
. Heard. Perused the grounds taken in the
ra238.16
2
Review Application. We do not see any reason to
entertain this Review Application, since there is
no error apparent on the face of record in the
order under review. The Review Application No.238
of 2016 stands rejected.
2.Consequently both the pending Civil
Applications also stand disposed of.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
asb/FEB17
The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Beed
Balaji s/o Vithalrao Savalkar
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court