The Revenue applicant unconditionally withdrew the notices of motion with an apology. The court dismissed both notices of motion as withdrawn.
Both Notices of Motion are dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
127-17-NMW-C=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 127 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1106 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 130 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1115 OF 2016
The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(3)(2), Mumbai & Anr. .. Applicants In the matter between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. .. Petitioner
v/s.
The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(3)(2), Mumbai & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Charanjeet Chanderpal for the applicant / orig. respondent Mr. S.J. Mehta for the respondent / orig. petitioner
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J. DATED : 24th MARCH, 2017.
P.C.
Revenue seeks to unconditionally withdraw the present notices of motion with an unconditional apology.
(A.K. MENON, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
1 of 1
Uday S. Jagtap
M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd.
The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(3)(2), Mumbai & Anr.
M.S. Sanklecha
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
