Notice of Motion dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the Plaintiffs' rights to file a fresh suit on cause of action in infringement if so advised and permissible in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28-NMS397-17.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 397 OF 2017
IN
SUIT NO. 136 OF 2017
Neelu Chirag Trivedi & Anr…Plaintiffs
Versus
Argento Home Products LLP & Ors…Defendants
Mr Vishal Kanade, i/b Vikramsinh Yadav, for the Plaintiffs.
Dr V Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate, with Mr VA Bhagat, i/b GS
Hegde & VA Bhagat, for Defendants Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:14th March 2017
PC:-
1.After some arguments, Mr Kanade seeks leave to withdraw
the Notice of Motion. The Notice of Motion is dismissed as
withdrawn. This is without prejudice to the Plaintiffs’ rights to file a
fresh suit on a cause of action in infringement, if so advised and if
permissible in law.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
14th March 2017
Neelu Chirag Trivedi
Argento Home Products LLP
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court