This notice of motion sought to condone a 47-day delay. The High Court allowed the application on a reading of the affidavit-in-support.
The application for condonation of time-period of 47 days was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SKN
1/1 1655.17-nma
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1655 OF 2017 IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 842 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2. … Applicant. V/s. Dena Bank. … Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the applicant.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND A.K.MENON, JJ. DATE : 13th November 2017.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Notice has been served on the respondent. Through respondent is represented by the advocate, none appears for the respondent. In view of the averments made in the affidavit-in-support, sufficient cause is made out to condone delay of 47 days. Accordingly, notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
Dena Bank
A.S. OKA
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
