The High Court at Bombay disposed of a Notice of Motion regarding an appeal under the Central Excise Act. Granting sufficient cause, the court made the Notice of Motion absolute in terms of the prayer clause.
Notice of Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-nma-1640-2017
rrpillai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1640 OF 2017
IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 104 OF 2017
M/s. Tube Products of India … Applicant
vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise Pune II … Respondent
Mr. Prakash Shah a/w. Mr. Jas Sanghvi i/b. PDS legal for the Applicant. Mr. Sham Walve a/w. Ms. Maya Majumdar for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ. DATE : 22nd NOVEMBER, 2017
P. C.
(A.K. MENON, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
1 of 1
M/s. Tube Products of India
Commissioner of Central Excise Pune II
A.S. OKA
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
