This single-paragraph order dismisses a writ challenge to an order of notice condoning delay in filing an income tax appeal. The High Court upheld the Notice of Motion making it absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nma-1373.17.odt
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1373 OF 2017
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1138 OF 2017
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 1 … Applicant In the matter between The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 1 … Appellant Vs. M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. … Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Applicant. Mr. A.K. Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 1st NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C.
1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and
the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. In view of the averments made in the affidavit in support, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay of 5 days. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
1 of 1
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 1
M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
A.S. OKA
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
