The High Court disposed of a miscellaneous petition in testamentary jurisdiction upon acceptance of consent terms mutually agreed upon by the parties.
Miscellaneous petition disposed of upon acceptance of consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mpt43-15.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
MISC. PETITION NO.43 OF 2015 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.376 OF 2012
Nanda Vinayak Wankhede ...Petitioner
vs
Anila Vinayak Wankhede ....Respondent
Mr. Mohan Dhamal, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Anil P. Bagwe, for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATED: 10 OCTOBER, 2017
P.C. :
. Learned Counsel for the parties tender Consent Terms duly signed by the parties, who are present in Court and also their respective Advocates. Learned Counsel submit that terms have been explained to the parties in their mother tongue. Learned Counsel seek disposal of the Miscellaneous Petition in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record, marked “X” for identification. Statements and undertakings contained therein are accepted. The Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. No order as to costs.
( S.C. GUPTE, J. )
Pg 1 of 1
Nanda Vinayak Wankhede
Anila Vinayak Wankhede
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
