The petitioner requested permission to withdraw a testamentary miscellaneous petition. The court, with the respondents' consent, permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MPT9_15.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.9 OF 2015 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.1028 OF 2013
Ramesh Harilal Padia … Petitioner Vs. Sharda Chandrakant Padia and others … Respondents
Mr. Hemant Telkar for Petitioner.
Ms Natasha Gupta i/b. Thakore Jariwala and Associates for Respondents.
CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J. DATE : AUGUST 21, 2017
P.C. :
Heard Mr. Telkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Ms Gupta, learned Counsel for the respondents.
(R. G. KETKAR, J.)
Minal Parab
1/1
Ramesh Harilal Padia
Sharda Chandrakant Padia
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
