Sau. Snehal (Tulsi) Manoj (Rupesh) Patil v. Manoj (Rupesh) Limba Patil
Case brief
What is this about?
Oral order dismissing Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 72 of 2017 for want of prosecution as applicant was not present.
Oral order dismissing Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 72 of 2017 for want of prosecution as applicant was not present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mca72.17
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2017
Sau. Snehal (Tulsi) w/o Manoj (Rupesh) Patil ..APPLICANT VERSUS Manoj (Rupesh) s/o Limba Patil ..RESPONDENT
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : 18th July, 2017
ORAL ORDER
None present for applicant. Misc. Civil Application Stands dismissed
for want of prosecution.
(N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
sjk
Sau. Snehal (Tulsi) w/o Manoj (Rupesh) Patil
Manoj (Rupesh) s/o Limba Patil
N.W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court