Restoration order condoning delay in filing application; C.A. and M.C.A. allowed/dissposed of. No substantive legal reasoning provided.
Delay in filing restoration application condoned; C.A. allowed; proceedings restored; M.C.A. disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4.4CAO.419.17
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
C.A.O. NO. 419/17 IN M.C.A. ST. NO. 26088/16 IN M.C.A. NO. 161/11 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2473 OF 2010.
(Irfanuddin s/o Rafiuddin .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. R.N. Sen, Advocate for petitioner, Mr. C.A. Lokhande, A.G.P. for respondent no.1.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 4, 2017.
For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing restoration application stands condoned. The C.A. is allowed.
M.C.A. ST. NO. 26088/16 :
Accepting reasons mentioned in the application, the proceedings are restored to file. The M.C.A. stands disposed of.
Judge Judge
J.
Irfanuddin s/o Rafiuddin
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
