The single judge court rejected civil applications for condonation of delay and review in a public interest litigation. No case was made out for interfering with the impugned order as no error apparent on the face of the record was noticed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3.3CAO.243.17.PIL.101.15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
C.A.O. NO. 243/17 IN M.C.A. ST. NO. 20496/16 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 101 OF 2015 (Ashokappa Narayanappa Iregaonkar .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. V.G. Wankhede, Advocate for petitioners, Mr. A.D. Sonak, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : MARCH 3, 2017.
No case is made out for interferring with the impugned order since no error apparent on the face of the record is noticed. The Civil Applications for condonation of delay and for review are rejected.
Judge Judge J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any error apparent on the face of the record exists to warrant interference with the impugned order.
Ashokappa Narayanappa Iregaonkar
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
