This single paragraph judgment grants leave for a leave petition in a suit between plaintiffs Hasanrao Shankarrao Deshmukh and defendant Monsanto Technology LLC. The sole judge held jurisdiction existed as part of the cause of action arose within the Court.
Leave granted; the petition is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-LPETN-92-2017.DOC
Jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION LEAVE PETITION NO. 92 OF 2017
IN
SUIT (L) NO. ____ OF 2017
Hasanrao Shankarrao Deshmukh & Anr…Plaintiffs
Versus
Monsanto Technology LLC & Anr…Defendants
…Defendants
Mr Rohan Kadam, i/b Abhijeet Mahadeokar for the Plaintiffs.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:3rd March 2017
PC:-
1.A material part of the cause of action arises within the
jurisdiction of this Court. A part of the cause of action is outside
Mumbai. The 1st Defendant is a US Company headquartered
outside Mumbai.
2.I am satisfied that with leave granted this Court would have
jurisdiction to entertain the Suit.
3. Leave granted. The Petition is made absolute.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
3rd March 2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit given that part of the cause of action arises within its jurisdiction.
Hasanrao Shankarrao Deshmukh
Monsanto Technology LLC
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court