Allowed
Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Mangal Enterprises
Bombay HCLPETN/58/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
920-NMSL361-17.DOC
SHEPHALI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 361 OF 2017
IN
SUIT (L) NO. 101 of 2017 WITH
LEAVE PETITION NO. 58 OF 2017
Hindustan Unilever Limited… Applicants
In the matter between
Hindustan Unilever Limited… Plaintiffs
Versus
Mangal Enterprises… Defendants
Mr Nikhil Sharma, a/w Ms Niyati Davawala, i/b WS Kane & Co for
the Plaintiffs.
Dr MS Deshpande, Court Receiver is present.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:15th March 2017
PC:-
1.The Defendants have been served. None appears. The
Petition for leave under Clause XIV is made absolute.
2.The Receiver has executed the order dated 22nd February
2017. His report is tendered.
Page 1 of 2
15th March 2017
920-NMSL361-17.DOC
3. There is no Affidavit in Reply nor any appearance on behalf of the Defendants.
4.For the reasons set out in the ad-interim order, the Notice of
Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (d) with
costs. In addition, the Plaintiffs will be entitled to the actual costs of
this Notice of Motion at the final disposal of the Suit.
5.Compliance with Rule 596 of the Bombay High Court (OS)
Rules is dispensed with.
6.Affidavit of Service to be filed in the Registry on or before
20th March 2017.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
15th March 2017
Hindustan Unilever Limited
Mangal Enterprises
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court