The Bombay High Court allowed the applicant's request to amend his affidavit to correct the date of a previous guardian order from November 2004 to December 2004, dispensing with re-verification.
Leave to amend the affidavit to correct the date of the order was granted; re-verification dispensed with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-JO-177-2017
1
Shailaja
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
JUDGES ORDER NO 177 OF 2017 IN
GUARDIAN PETITION NO. 68 OF 2010
Sunil Muneshwar Pandey ] Petitioner And Ambuj Gangaprasad Pandey ] Applicant
Mr. Rohan Savant a/w Mr. S.S. Gawde, for applicant.
CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J.
DATE : 16th AUGUST, 2017.
P.C .
Heard Mr. Sawant, learned Counsel for the applicant at
length.
2 23-JO-177-2017
renew the same from time to time till further orders of this Court. This Court also passed order in terms of prayer clause (e).
3 23-JO-177-2017
Officer, High Court, Bombay certifying that amount of Rs. 3,27,719/- is lying in Fixed Deposit Receipt with Bank of Maharashtra, Boribunder Branch, Mumbai and fixed deposit receipt of Rs. 2172/-lying with Bank of Baroda, Fort Branch, Mumbai aggregating to Rs. 3,29,891/-. Accordingly, Judges order is signed separately.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to amend an affidavit to correct the date of a prior order should be granted.
Sunil Muneshwar Pandey
Ambuj Gangaprasad Pandey
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
