The appeal in Family Court Appeal No. 96 of 2009 and associated Civil Application No. 140 of 2009 were disposed of as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.
Withdrawal of Appeal No. 96 of 2009 and discontinuation of Civil Application No. 140 of 2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk 1 226-FCA-96-09.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.96 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.140 OF 2009 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.96 OF 2009
Hetal Samir Mheta
..Petitioner
Vs.
Samir Rajinkant Mehta
..Respondent
Mr. Sushil Upadhyay h/f Mr. Ashok M. Sarogi for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.
CORAM: B. R. GAVAI AND RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE: 28th JULY 2017
P.C.:
. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the Appeal. Appeal is therefore disposed of as withdrawn.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (B. R. GAVAI, J.)
Hetal Samir Mheta
Samir Rajinkant Mehta
B. R. Gavai
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
