Mohan Anandrao Deshmukh v. Naveli Mohan Deshmukh
Case brief
What is this about?
The high court appended the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear while the respondent was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 42 OF 2004
MOHAN ANANDRAO DESHMUKH VERSUS
NAVELI MOHAN DESHMUKH
Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D.V. Soman
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE AND S.M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATED : September 13, 2017.
ORDER :
. Learned counsel Shri. Soman for respondent is present.
Nobody is present for appellant. Seen the order dated 7.9.2017.
On that day also nobody was present for appellant. No interest is shown to prosecute the matter. Record and proceeding is already received. So, the matter is dismissed for default.
[S.M. GAVHANE, J.] [T.V. NALAWADE, J.]
ssc/
MOHAN ANANDRAO DESHMUKH
NAVELI MOHAN DESHMUKH
T.V. NALAWADE
S.M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court