This order dismisses a Civil Application filed by the appellant for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear after notices were issued.
Civil Application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
18 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2013 WITH FCA/22/2012 WITH CA/14269/2012 IN FCA/22/2012
DR. SANGITA PRASHANT PATIL
VERSUS
DR. PRASHANT SHRINIWAS PATIL
Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Surekha P. Mahajan
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE AND S.M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATED : September 25, 2017.
ORDER :
. The learned counsel for respondent Smt. Mahajan is present. Nobody is present for appellant. Seen the orders made by this Court on 7.8.2017 and 15.9.2017. Nobody is turning up for the appellant and no interest is shown to prosecute the matters. Record and proceeding is received and the matters are ready for admission purpose.
disposed of.
[S.M. GAVHANE, J.] [T.V. NALAWADE, J.]
ssc/
DR. SANGITA PRASHANT PATIL
DR. PRASHANT SHRINIWAS PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
S.M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
