The court modified and disposed of a motion to delete a clause in a 2017 judgment based on a 2011 order condoning filing delay. No substantive issue on land acquisition was decided. Quality is thin.
Deleted clause IV of the operative part of the judgment dated 27.7.2017; motion disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fa1126.11
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1126 OF 2011
SUPDU GOVIND MAHAJAN (WARKE) VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER AND ANOTHER
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1127 OF 2011
PARSHURAM GOVINDA WARKE (MAHAJAN) VERSUS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER AND ANOTHER
Mr. V.Y. Patil, advocate for the appellants
CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J. DATED : 9th AUGUST, 2017
PER COURT :-
rlj/
Supdu Govind Mahajan (Warke)
Parshuram Govinda Warke (Mahajan)
The Special Land Acquisiton Officer
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
