Disposed
Manju Anil Aggarwal (Alias Manju Lalchand Aggarwal) v. Rammurti Lalchand Goyal and Anr.
Bombay HCCST/141/2017
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cst141-17.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.141 OF 2017 IN MISC. PETITION NO.116 OF 2017 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.530 OF 1992
Manju Anil Aggarwal ...Applicant/Petitioner
Rammurti Lalchand Goyal and Anr. ....Respondents
Mr. Gaurav Jangle, i/b. I.V. Merchant & Co., for the Petitioner.
Mr. Chetan Mhatre, i/b. Utangale & Co., for the Respondents.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATED: 7 NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C. :
. The Chamber Summons seeks deletion of the name of Respondent No.1 from the cause title of the Miscellaneous Petition. Respondent No.1 has expired during the pendency of the Miscellaneous Petition. Her legal heirs and next of kin are already on record and have also filed reply to the Miscellaneous Petition. The Chamber Summons is, accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. Let the Miscellaneous Petition be placed for final hearing at the stage of admission, as ordered by this Court in its order dated 3 May 2016.
Pg 1 of 2
cst141-17.doc
( S.C. GUPTE, J. )
Pg 2 of 2
Manju Anil Aggarwal
Rammurti Lalchand Goyal
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court