The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad noted a cost order inconsistency in a civil revision application. The court enhanced costs from Rs. 1000 to Rs. 5000 and disposed of the application.
Costs enhanced from Rs. 1000 to Rs. 5000; revision application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRA 44-2015
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2015
Rajdhar Girdhar More,
age 51 years occupation agriculture R/o Moykheda Taluka Jamner District Jalgaon.
...APPLICANT
VERSUS
...RESPONDENTS
Mr Girish V. Wani, Advocate for Petitioner
Mr Ajit M. Gholap, Advocate for respondents No. 1, 3 & 4
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 26th July, 2017
ORAL ORDER
Leave to amendment. Amendment be carried out forthwith.
CRA 44-2015
weeks from today.
( N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
pjm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision application should be allowed to enhance costs.
Rajdhar Girdhar More
Sukhlal Madhav Pardeshi (Teli)
Kadu Narayan Kapare
Sambhaji S/o Govinda Patil
Chairman, Vivid Karyakari Co-operative Society
N.W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
