Disposed

Goa Industrial Development Corporation, Thr. Its Managing Director., v. Alandro Dilip Nunes and 4 Ors.

Bombay HC16 Nov 2017CRA/13/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a revision application, the Bombay High Court at Goa disposed of the matter by keeping contentions regarding statutory notice service open for future appeal. The court ordered the Trial Judge to favorably consider an application for an extension of time to file a Written Statement.

What did the court decide?

Contentions on service of notice kept open for appeal; extension of time for Written Statement to be considered favorably.

Goa Industrial Development Corporation, Thr… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

Santosh 1 cra13-17dt.16-11-17

¶2

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL RIVISION APPLICATION NO. 13 OF 2017.
Goa Industrial Dev. Corporation. ..…. Applicants.
Versus
Alandro Dilip Nunes and ors. ....... Respondents.

¶3

Mr. H.D. Naik, Advocate for the Applicants.

¶4

Mr.V.R. Tambai & Mr. Paresh Sawant, Advocates for the
Respondent No.1.

¶5

Mr. Gaurish Agni, Advocate for the Respondent No.3.

¶6

Coram : N.M. Jamdar, J.
 Date : 16 November 2017.

¶7

P.C.:

¶8

Mr. H.D. Naik, the learned Counsel for the
Applicant states that the Applicant will be satisfied if the
contention raised by the Applicant regarding non-service of
notice as per Section 52-A of the Goa Industrial Development
Corporation Act, 1965 is kept open to be agitated in an Appeal if
such an eventuality arises.

¶9

2.In view of this statement it is not necessary to
examine the correctness of the impugned order. The contentions

¶10

Santosh 2 cra13-17dt.16-11-17

¶11

of the parties with regard to service of a statutory notice are kept
open, to be considered in an appeal, if situation so warrants.

¶12

3.If an application is made by the Applicant for
extension of time to file Written Statement, the learned Trial
Judge will consider the same favourably, in view of the fact that
the Applicant was prosecuting the Application under Order 7,
Rule 11 C.P.C.

¶13

4.The Revision Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶14

 N.M. Jamdar, J.

Goa Industrial Development Corporation, Thr. Its Managing Director., v. Alandro Dilip Nunes and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Goa Industrial Development Corporation, Thr. Its Managing Director., v. Alandro Dilip Nunes and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jude G. Tandon and Anr., Vs Sunil Noronha and Anr.

Branch Manager and Anr., Vs Shri. Sai Labour Contract Co-Op. Society, Thr. Its Secretary, Katri Balachandran Vadkke and Anr.

Anant Vaman Parab., Vs Shri. Devi Bhumika Vetal Devastan Palyem Pernem, Rep. by Its President Sadashiv v. Parab and 4 Ors.

Laxman S. Gaokar (Dec) Rep. by His Lrs., Vs Pramila Kanta Naik and 2 Ors.

Savlo Shivram Mandrekar and Anr., Vs Kumudini Gurudas Joshi, Rep. Thr. Poa, Sanjay R. Joshi (Dec) Rep. by His Legal Rep.

Savlo Shivram Mandrekar and Anr., Vs Kumudini Gurudas Joshi, Rep. Thr. Poa, Sanjay R. Joshi (Dec) Rep. by Her Legal Rep.