The company petition was dismissed on the petitioner's withdrawal after the respondent settled their claim. The accompanying civil application was also disposed of.
None; petition dismissed on withdrawal and civil application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28.CP-406-2016.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.406 OF 2016 WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.511 OF 2017 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.406 OF 2016
Arrow ECS Asia PTE Ltd.
….Petitioner
Vs.
Servpro Technologies Pvt. Ltd. ….Respondent
Ms. Rinika Jain i/b. D.B. Pereira for applicant/petitioner. None for respondent.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 10th OCTOBER, 2017
P.C.:
1 Ms. Jain, counsel for petitioner on instructions from Advocate
D.B. Pereira seeks leave to withdraw the petition as respondent has settled
their claim.
2 Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Accordingly, civil
application also stands disposed.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Gauri Gaekwad
Arrow ECS Asia Pte Ltd.
Servpro Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
K.R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
