Order in a contempt petition where counsel stated that the court's order was complied with, leading to the purging of contempt and disposal of the petitions.
The petitions stand disposed of after contempt was purged for compliance with the preceding order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1_CP66515.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 665 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1883 OF 2014
Omprakash Narayanrao Shastri and Others
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
Ujwal Huke and Others
..RESPONDENTS
WITH
CP/662/15 IN WP/446/15 WITH CP/62/16 IN WP/3861/14 WITH CP/263/16 IN WP/9986/14 WITH CP/265/16 IN WP/6982/11 WITH CP/472/16 IN WP/3874/14
Mr. A.D. Pawar, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. B.A. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondent - State.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 27th MARCH, 2017
ORDER :
the order of the Court is complied with. In view of that the contempts stand purged. Petitions stand disposed of.
( SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J. ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. )
SSD
1 / 1
Omprakash Narayanrao Shastri and Others
Ujwal Huke and Others
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
