This corny order disposes a contempt petition on a single line after the learned Assistant Government Pleder submitted that the non-compliance order had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vina k. main.sr.49.cp.164.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.164 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10571 OF 2012
Shri. Tathe Sharad Panditrao & anr. … Petitioners
V/s.
Shri. Ghate Deepak Bhausaheb & ors. ... Respondents
None for the petitioner. Ms. R. M. Shinde, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent nos.2 & 3.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 9 JANUARY, 2017.
P.C. :
. Learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader on instructions submits that the order of non compliance which has been alleged, has already been complied with.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Shri. Tathe Sharad Panditrao
Shri. Ghate Deepak Bhausaheb
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
