Allowed

Ground Control Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. Elder Health Care Limited Cin L24230MH1988PLC046613

Bombay HC30 Oct 2017CP/125/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Multiple company petitions against Elder Health Care Limited, which was already wound up, were made absolute. Petitioners were given liberty to lodge claims with the Official Liquidator for disposal according to law. No order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

All petitions made absolute with liberty to lodge claims with the Official Liquidator for disposal in accordance with law.

Ground Control Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs Elder Health… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

8.CP-501-2014.doc

¶2

1/3

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

COMPANY PETITION NO.501 OF 2014

¶5

Chirnajilalji Finance Limited ….Petitioner Vs. Elder Health Care Limited ….Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.502 OF 2014 P.P. Estates Private Limited ….Petitioner Vs. Elder Health Care Limited ….Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.564 OF 2014 Gyan Traders Limited ….Petitioner Vs. Elder Health Care Limited ….Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.592 OF 2014 Vision Trimpex Limited ….Petitioner Vs. Elder Health Care Limited ….Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.618 OF 2014 Monet Securities Private Limited ….Petitioner Vs. Elder Health Care Limited ….Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.645 OF 2014 Alliance Soaps Private Limited ….Petitioner Vs. Elder Health Care Limited ….Respondent

Gauri Gaekwad

8.CP-501-2014.doc

2/3

WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.720 OF 2014

¶10

M/s. Foltene Laboratories S.R.L. (formerly known as M/s. Foltene Laboratories )

¶11

….Petitioner

¶12

Vs.

¶13

Elder Health Care Limited ….Respondent

¶14

WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.125 OF 2015

¶15

Ground Control Properties Private Limited ….Petitioner

¶16

Vs.

¶17

Elder Health Care Limited

¶18

….Respondent

¶19

WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.622 OF 2015

¶20

Sandy Sales Private Limited ….Petitioner

¶21

Vs.

¶22

Elder Health Care Limited ….Respondent

¶23

Mr. Kartik Prasad i/b. M/s. Dhruve Liladhar and Co. for petitioner in CP/501/2014, CP/502/2014, CP/564/2014, CP/592/2014, CP/618/2014 and CP/645/2014.

¶24

Mr. Aziz Khan i/b. Divya Shah Associates for petitioner in CP/125/2015 and CP/622/2015.

¶25

Mr. Gaurav Parkar i/b. L.H. Hingu and Co. for respondent in CP/720/2014. Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, Assistant Official Liquidator present.

¶26

CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 30^th OCTOBER, 2017

¶27

P.C.:

¶28

1 Mr. Prasad, counsel for petitioner in company petition no.501

¶29

of 2014 states that respondent company is already wound up by an order

¶30

dated 13^th April, 2017.

Gauri Gaekwad

8.CP-501-2014.doc

3/3

2 Accordingly, all petitions made absolute in terms of prayer clauses – (a) and (b). No order as to costs.

¶35

3 Liberty to petitioner to lodge their claim with the Official Liquidator, who shall consider the same and dispose in accordance with law.

¶36

(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

¶37

Gauri Gaekwad

Ground Control Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. Elder Health Care Limited Cin L24230MH1988PLC046613

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ground Control Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. Elder Health Care Limited Cin L24230MH1988PLC046613

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Vs Arpita Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. and 2 Ors.

Tsur Ben David and Anr. Vs Cqm Cooling Quality Management Ltd. and 3 Ors.

Dipti Home Makers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Surya Co-Operative Housing Society Limited and 3 Ors.

M/S J D Steel Corporation Vs the Freyssinet Pre-Stressed Concrete Company Ltd. Cin No. U74999MH1954PLC009421

Hdfc Bank Limited Vs Veena Industries Limited Cin U29299PN1996PLC103190

Ess Dee Aluminum Ltd. Vs Sharp Industries Ltd. (CIN-L99999MH1988PLC046467)