Single line procedural order by the High Court of Bombay at Goa listing a company petition for admission on 30 November 2017 at the request of the respondent's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Santosh 1 cop13-16dt.10-11-17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
COMPANY PETITION NO.13 OF 2016
Sushma and Co.(Electrical) ..…. Petitioner.
Versus
Western India Shipyard Ltd. …... Respondents.
Mr. F. E. Noronha, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Vithal Naik, Advocate for the Respondent.
Coram : N.M. Jamdar, J.
Date : 10 November 2017.
P.C.:
At the request of the learned Counsel for the
Respondent, S.O. to 30 November 2017. To be listed under the
caption "For admission".
N.M. Jamdar, J.
Sushma and Co.(Electrical)
Western India Shipyard Ltd.
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court