Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to lack of response from the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.3CONP.1.12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1 OF 2012. (Bellezza (India) Pvt. Ltd. .vs. Mr. Prasanna V. Muley)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S.G. Joshi, Advocate for petitioner, Mr. R.S. Sundaram, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ. DATED : MARCH 20, 2017.
Mr. S.G. Joshi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that in spite of sincere efforts, the petitioner is not responding.
It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the
petition.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Judge Judge
J.
Bellezza (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Mr. Prasanna V. Muley
B.R. GAVAI
INDIRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
