Disposed

Ajanta Pharma Limited v. Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Anr.

Bombay HC27 Nov 2017COMAP/88/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This appeal and suit involving trademark disputes between Ajanta Pharma Limited and Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. were disposed of upon the parties reaching a settlement. The court recorded consent minutes and undertakings regarding trademark usage and approved the disposal of the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Appeal and pending suit disposed of in terms of the Consent Minutes of Order and undertaking by respondents.

Ajanta Pharma Limited Vs Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and… — Specific Performance | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

COMAP88_17.sxw

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

¶4

COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.88 OF 2017 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2681 OF 2016 IN SUIT NO.798 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1129 OF 2017 IN

¶5

COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.88 OF 2017

¶6

Ajanta Pharma Limited … Appellant Vs. Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another … Respondents

¶7

Dr. V. V. Tulzapurkar a/w. Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Mr. Aasif Navodia and Mr. Asim Hazra i/b. W. S. Kane & Co. for Appellant.

¶8

Mr. Alankar Kirpekar a/w. Mr. Shekhar Bhagat i/b. MAG Letal for Respondent No.1-Original Defendant No.1.

¶9

Mr. V. Dhond, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Aashish Kamat and Mr. Darshan Mehta i/b. M/s. Dhruve Liladhar and Co. for Respondent No.2.

¶10

CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & R. G. KETKAR, JJ.

¶11

DATE : NOVEMBER 27, 2017

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant and the respondent No.2 tendered the “Consent Minutes of Order” dated 27.11.2017 running into 3 pages (5 paragraphs) along with the extract of the Minutes of the Meeting of the Executive Committee of Directors of Ajanta Pharma Limited held on 25.11.2017. The learned Counsel submit that the parties have settled the disputes in respect of the subject matter of the present Suit and the Appeal.

¶14

1/3

¶15

COMAP88_17.sxw

¶16

Consent Minutes of Order dated 27.11.2017 is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Paragraphs a, b and c of the Consent Minutes of Order read as under:

¶17

“a. Respondent No.2 agrees and undertakes that it shall not use the trademarks “FERINTA” and “INTAS FERINTAS”;

¶18

b. The Appellant agrees and undertakes that it has no objection to Respondent No.2 using the trademark “FERITAS” (with or without adjuncts, not limited to “XT”, “Z” and / or “Syrup”);

¶19

c. The Appellant agrees that Respondent No.2 may dispose off its existing stock (i.e. manufactured before 23^rd November 2017) under the mark “INTAS FERINTAS” within 4 months from the date hereof.”

¶20

The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 is present. On instructions, he submits that the respondent No.1 herein (original defendant No.1) undertakes that it shall not manufacture (for defendant No.2 or any one else) goods bearing the Marks “FERINTA” or “INTAS FERINTAS”.

¶21

In view of the Consent Minutes of Order and the undertaking given by the defendant No.1, the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties submit that the present Appeal as also the the pending Suit bearing Commercial Suit No.549 of 2016 pending on the file of the learned Single Judge of this Court may be disposed of.

¶22

We accept the undertaking given by the respondent No.1. After perusing the Consent Minutes of Order and after considering the subject matter of the settlement, we are satisfied that the dispute between the parties is lawfully settled in terms of the Consent Minutes of Order. The Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Consent Minutes of Order. Commercial Suit No.549 of 2016 stands disposed of against the respondent No.2 in terms of the Consent Minutes of Order. The said

¶23

2/3

¶24

COMAP88_17.sxw

¶25

Suit stands disposed of against the respondent No.1 in terms of the undertaking given by the respondent No.1, as recorded above. On request, the Registry to refund Court Fees in accordance with the Rules.

¶26

All pending Suits / Motions, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.

¶27

(R. G. KETKAR, J.)

¶28

(NARESH H. PATIL, J.)

¶29

Minal Parab

¶30

3/3

Ajanta Pharma Limited v. Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajanta Pharma Limited v. Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Javed S/O Janimiya Sayyad @ Shaikh and Anr. Vs Mr. Digamber S/O Shankarbhat Ambalgi and Ors.

The Senior Superintendent of Post Office, Mumbai and 3 Ors. Vs Mr.Kaushal Bagadia and Ors.

Apex Encon Projects Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs L and T Finance Ltd.

Sri Kalpatharu Housing Pvt. Ltd. Vs Kalpataru Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Nirmal Ujwal Credit Chsl Nagpur (Multi State) Vs the Union of India and 2 Ors.

Mig (Bandra) Realtors and Builders Private Limited Vs the Union of India and 2 Ors.