The appellant withdrew its commercial appeal. Leave was granted to pursue appropriate proceedings elsewhere. The court disposed of the appeal without deciding its merits.
Leave was granted to pursue appropriate proceedings elsewhere; appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15-COMAP-83-2017
1
Shailaja
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINLA CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMMERCIAL DIVISION APPEAL NO. 83 OF 2017
HATHWAY CABLE AND DATACOM LTD. ] Appellant Vs. DIGITAL INFOTAINMENT PRIVATE LTD. ] AND ANOTHER ] Respondents
Mr. Rohan Kelkar a/w Mr. Mukul Taly a/w Ms. Sanchita Sridhar i/b S. Mahomedbhai & Co. for appellant.
Mr. Gaurav Doshi, Sr. Advocate a/w Mr. Mihir Mody a/w Sandesh Shukla a/w Ms. Pranali Adangale i/b K. Ashar & Co., for the respondents.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & RAJESH G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE: 29th NOVEMBER, 2017.
P.C :
Learned Advocate for the appellant on instructions submits that issue of maintainability of the appeal was raised. On instructions, he seeks withdrawal of this appeal.
2 15-COMAP-83-2017
(RAJESH .G. KETKAR, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)
HATHWAY CABLE AND DATACOM LTD.
DIGITAL INFOTAINMENT PRIVATE LTD.
NARESH H. PATIL
RAJESH G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
