This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
chs 1834 of 2016 .sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1834 OF 2016
IN
SUIT NO.4326 OF 1997
White Rose Developers Pvt. Ltd.
…
Applicant/Plaintiff
versus
Nirmala Chopra and Ors.
…Defendants
Mr. Pradeep Bakhru i/by M/s. Wadia Ghandy and Co., for Plaintiff.
Ms. M. M.Patel i/by M/s. M.M.Patel and Co., for Defendant Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 19th APRIL, 2017
P.C.:
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.
2. Perused the Chamber Summons and the Affidavit in support thereto.
For reasons set out in the Affidavit in support of the Chamber Summons, the
Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) which are
reproduced hereunder :
“(a) that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the
Applicant/Plaintiff to amend the Plaint and all other ancillary
pleadings in the captioned suit in terms of the Schedule annexed
hereto;
(b)that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the
Applicant/Plaintiff to amend Notice of Motion No.271 of 2016 filed
by the Applicant/Plaintiff in Suit No.4326 of 1997 in terms of the
1/2
ssp
chs 1834 of 2016 .sxw
Schedule annexed hereto;”
2. Amendments to be carried out on or before 21st April, 2017. Re-
verification is dispensed with.
3. The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
2/2
ssp
White Rose Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Nirmala Chopra and Ors.
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court