The Court disposed of the appeal by relying on the reasoning in Central Excise Appeal No.90 of 2006, substituting the unit name from M/s. Neha Refrigeration to M/s. Engineer Industries.
The appeal was disposed of for the reasons recorded in Central Excise Appeal No.90 of 2006 with the substitution of the unit name.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-CEXA-136.2006.doc
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.136 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I .... Appellant Vs. M/s. Sapna Engineering & 2 Others .... Respondents
Ms P.S. Cardozo with Mr. Joel A. Carlos for the Appellant.
Mr. V.M. Doiphode i/by M/s. V.M. Doiphode & Co. for the Respondents.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : MARCH 14, 2017
P.C:
Page 1 of 2
7-CEXA-136.2006.doc
suresh
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the facts in the present appeal are identical to Central Excise Appeal No.90 of 2006 and need separate judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Central Excise Appeal No.90 of 2006Relied on¶1
Central Excise Appeal No.90 of 2006
The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I
M/s. Sapna Engineering & 2 Others
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
