The court dropped the notice issued to respondent no. 2 and permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty prayed for in the prayer clause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.4CAW.995.17
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
C.A.W. NO. 995/17 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6541 OF 2016 (Rizwana Fatima d/o Abdul Habib Rizvi .vs. The Maharashtra University of Health Sciences & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. N.S. Khubalkar, Advocate for petitioner, Mr. J.B. Jaiswal, Advocate for respondent no. 1, Mr. Nikhil Gaikwad, Advocate for respondent no.2.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATED : APRIL 24, 2017.
For the reasons stated, notice issued to respondent no.2 is dropped.
The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty as prayed in prayer clause (i) of the Civil Application.
Judge Judge J.
Rizwana Fatima d/o Abdul Habib Rizvi
The Maharashtra University of Health Sciences
B.R. GAVAI
A.S. CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
