Order permitting petitioners to amend the writ petition and bring legal representatives of respondent No. 7 on record after accepting uncontested submissions.
Petitioners permitted to bring legal representatives of respondent No. 7 on record; Civil applications allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp5852.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 5852 OF 2012
(SMT. KAMLABAI SURESH PAWAR & 3 OTH....VS.. STATE OF MAH. & 6 OTH.)
Shri S.S.Dhengale, Advocate for Petitioners. Ms Shamsi Haider, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6. Shri Prasad Dharkar, Adv. h/f. Shri A. Parchure, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 7(i) to 7(iv).
CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J. DATED : APRIL 13, 2017.
CAW NO. 02/2017.
Heard.
Accepting the submissions made in the application, which are not controverted, the petitioners are permitted to bring on record the legal representatives of the respondent No.7.
The civil application is allowed accordingly.
W.P. NO. 5852/2012.
Shri Prasad Dharkar, advocate holding for Shri A. Parchure, advocate waives notice of the petition for the respondent Nos. 7(i) to 7(iv).
2 wp5852.12
CAW NO. 890/2017.
Though the learned advocate for the respondent Nos. 7(i) to 7(iv) has opposed the prayer in this application, considering the nature of controversy, the petitioners are permitted to amend the petition as prayed.
The civil application is allowed accordingly.
JUDGE
RRaut ..
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Kamlabai Suresh Pawar & 3 oth.
State of Maharashtra
6 oth.
R. Raut
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
