Allowed

Pravin S/O Bhaskarrao Ragit v. Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, Mumbai through Member Secretary, and Others

Bombay HC27 Mar 2017CAW/368/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench allowed a civil application for amendment in a writ petition, permitting amendment within one week while respondents were given two weeks to file consequential replies.

What did the court decide?

Civil Application allowed; amendment to be carried out within one week; respondents to file consequential replies within two weeks thereafter.

Pravin S/O Bhaskarrao Ragit v. Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, Mumbai through Member Secretary, and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pravin S/O Bhaskarrao Ragit v. Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, Mumbai through Member Secretary, and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuldeep S/O Atmaram Shende Vs Shri. Anil Pardhi, Joint Director of Education, Nagpur

Panjab Onkarrao Sangole Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Khallar, Tq. Daryapur Dist. Amravati

Babarao S/O Chandrabhan Wankhede (in Jail) Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. Khamgaon (City) Buldhana

Mr. Keshav Agarwal Carrying on Business in the Name of M/S Agrawal Construction, Nagpur Vs the Union of India Thr. Its the Ministry of Finance Dept. of Revenu, New Delhi

Pradip S/O Tukaram Sapkal Vs the Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee No. 2, Akola Thr Its Chairman and Another

Ashokraj S/O Deshraj Kumar, and Others Vs the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Rehabilitation of Enemy Property, New Delhi and Others