The court disposed of the civil application due to want of prosecution as no representative appeared for the petitioner in the writ petition.
Civil application disposed of due to want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw-2438-14.doc
rpa 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2438 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3582 OF 2016
Nitin S. Mulgir & Ors.
.. Applicants
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Maharashtra Association for Canoeing & Kayaking Vs. Indian Kayaking & Canoeing Association & Ors.
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
Mr. G. M. Savagave, Advocate for the Applicants. None for the Petitioner. Mr. V. S. Kapse, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.4. Mr. Bharat H. Mehta, Advocate for Respondent No.6–UOI.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATED : JANUARY 10, 2017.
P.C. :
Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 submits that now nothing survives in this petition. However, since no one is appearing for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. As a result Civil Application also stands disposed of.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Nitin S. Mulgir & Ors.
Maharashtra Association for Canoeing & Kayaking
Indian Kayaking & Canoeing Association & Ors.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
