Civil Application seeking restoration of a writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution. The Court condoned the delay in the restoration application and restored the petition to file for final hearing.
Order dismissing writ petition for want of prosecution set aside; petition restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4 CAW 2243 OF 2017.doc
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2243 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.6638 OF 2000
Mahadu B. Sadlapurkar … Applicant. V/s. Union of India and anr …. Respondents
Mr. A. S. Rao, for Applicant.
Mr. Rui Rodrigues, Mr. N. R. Prajapati and Mr. B.A. Dubey, for the Respondents.
CORAM : SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 25TH SEPTEMBER, 2017.
P.C. :
forthwith.
Page No.1 of 2
4 CAW 2243 OF 2017.doc
dismissing the petition for want of prosecution be set aside and the Writ Petition be restored to file.
course.
Page No.2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in preferring the restoration application should be condoned to set aside the order of dismissal for want of prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahadu B. Sadlapurkar
Union of India
V. K. Tahilramani
Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
