A concise civil application (C.A.W.) arising from a writ petition was disposed of by the High Court bench without finding respondents fully satisfied, without laying down precedent.
Civil application disposed of. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0509caw2022.17
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
C.A.W.NO. 2022/2017 IN W.P.NO. 5444/2016.
Smt. Vandana Prakash Samarth
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & ARUN D. UPADHYE, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 05, 2017.
Heard.
application by respondent no.3, though we are not fully satisfied, without laying down any precedent, we recall paragraph nos. 6 and 7 of the order dated 21.08.2017 in Writ Petition no. 5444/2016.
of. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Smt. Vandana Prakash Samarth
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
ARUN D. UPADHYE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
