This order recalls a previous direction to remain present for the admission of a writ petition. It directs the relevant respondents to attend the hearing on admission date and disposes of the civil application without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1512caw1279.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 1279 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1766 OF 2017
(Pratibha Dynanobaji Ridhorkar vs. The State of Maharashtra thr. Secretary, Social Welfare Department & Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,_____________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & ROHIT B. DEO, JJ. DECEMBER 15, 2017.
Heard Shri N.S. Warulkar, learned counsel for the applicants – respondent Nos. 4 & 5, Shri P.B. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.M. Ukey, learned Additional GP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*GS.
Pratibha Dynanobaji Ridhorkar
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharmadhikari
Rohit B. Deo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
