This single judge order disposed of an intervention application as infructuous because the related writ petition, in which the applicant sought intervention, had been allowed to be withdrawn.
Civil Application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
51-caw1213-17.doc
Kavita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1213 OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4433 OF 2017
Vinod Dataprasad Tripathi and Anr. …Applicants. In the matter of:- M/s.Sojar Motors Pvt.Ltd. ….Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents
None for the Applicants. Mr. Vishal C.Ghosalkar for Respondent No.4 Ms.Jyoti Jadhav,AGP for Respondent Nos.1,3 and 5
CORAM: SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATED: 16th June, 2017
PC:-
1. None present for the Applicants. This application dated
12th April, 2017 was filed for intervention in Writ Petition No.
4433 of 2017. By order dated 20th April, 2017, the said Writ
Petition was allowed to be withdrawn. Since the Writ Petition
Page 1 of 2
51-caw1213-17.doc
Kavita
itself has been withdrawn, the application for intervention is rendered infructous.
2. Hence, the Civil Application stands disposed of.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. )
Page 2 of 2
Vinod Dataprasad Tripathi and Anr.
M/s. Sojar Motors Pvt. Ltd.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Anuja Prabhu Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
