THE HIGH COURT
Conditional allowance of application; 50% of deposited amount withdrawn pending undertaking.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
2609 FA 1093-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
C.A.O. No. 1394/2017 IN FIRST APPEAL No. 1093/2017
(EXE. ENGINEER, LOWER PUS PROJECT, PUSAD, DISTT. YAVATMAL AND ANOTHER -vsGOPAL OMKARMAL MOR AND OTHERS)
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Shri A. Parihar, counsel for appellant. Shri A.B. Nakshane, counsel for respondent no.1. Ms. T.H. Udeshi, AGP for respondent nos.2 and 3.
CORAM: S.B. SHUKRE, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2017.
Heard.
Perused the award and the grounds taken in the memo of appeal.
I am of the view that this application can be conditionally allowed and it is allowed accordingly.
The respondent no.1 is permitted to withdraw 50% of the deposited amount against his furnishing usual undertaking and remaining 50% of the deposited amount against his furnishing solvent surety to the satisfaction of the learned Registrar, both to be furnished within six weeks from the date of the order.
Application is disposed of.
JUDGE
Yenurkar
Executor Engineer, Lower PUS Project, Pusad, Distt. Yavatmal and Another
Gopal Omkarmal Mor
S. B. Shukre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
