Court permitted withdrawal of Rs. 70,000 deposited under its orders, disposing of the civil application against the absent counsel.
Permitted withdrawal of amount of Rs. 70,000 deposited in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application [CAN] No. 25 of 2017 IN
Contempt Petition No. 215 of 2016 [decided] IN Writ Petition No.2599 of 1998 [decided] [Sadaram Maroti Rehpade Vs. Punyawan Shivram Tagade & two others]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. R.D. Karode, Adv., for the petitioner.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATE : 20th April, 2017
This is an application made by the petitioner for withdrawal of the amount of Rs.70,000-00.
Though the matter has been adjourned time and again so as to enable Shri H.A. Deshpande, learned counsel for respondent no.1, to remain present, he has chosen to remain absent.
On perusal of the order-sheets, we find that the amount has been directed to be deposited under the orders of this Court and finding that the petitioner is entitled to receive the same, the petitioner is permitted
2
to withdraw the amount of Rs. 70,000-00 [rupees seventy thousand only] deposited in this Court.
In that view of the matter, Civil Application is disposed of.
Judge
Judge .
|hedau|
Sadaram Maroti Rehpade
Punyawan Shivram Tagade
B.R. Gavai
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
