Dismissed
Mrs. Vimal @Dipu Santoshkumar Karekar v. Mr. Santoshkumar Manohar Karekar
Bombay HCCAM/62/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 21_cam_62_2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.62 OF 2017 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.157 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.220 OF 2014 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.221 OF 2014 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.158 OF 2014
Vimal @ Dipu Sanstoshkumar Karekar ...Applicant Versus Sanstoshkumar Manohar Karekar ...Respondent
Mr. Anand Shivaji Patil for the Applicant-wife.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 22nd MARCH, 2017.
P.C.:-
Considering the fact that the Family Court Appeals from the
year 2008 onwards are pending for final hearing, out of turn priority
cannot be given to the Family Court Appeal of the year 2014. Hence,
the Application is rejected.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
Megha
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an out-of-turn priority should be given to a pending Family Court Appeal of 2014 given the backlog of appeals pending since 2008.
Vimal @ Dipu Sanstoshkumar Karekar
Sanstoshkumar Manohar Karekar
A.S. OKA
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court