The High Court considered an application for condonation of a 20-day delay in filing a Family Court Appeal. The court accepted the applicant's explanation and allowed the condonation, placing the appeal for admission.
The civil application filed for condonation of delay is allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(CAM 254 OF 2015)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 254 OF 2015
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) No. 14544 OF 2015
Sou. Neha Abhijit Mangudkar ...Applicant/Appellant Vs. Mr. Abhijit Bharat Mangudkar ...Respondent
Mr. Shrishailay S. Deshmukh for the Applicant/Appellant
Mr. Dhananjay Patil for Respondent. ***********
CORAM : V.M. KANADE & P.R. BORA, JJ
DATE : FEBRUARY 06, 2017
P.C. :
1/3
(CAM 254 OF 2015)
stated in her civil application that it took time for her to send the papers to her advocate and, therefore, the delay was caused in filing the FCA.
2/3
(CAM 254 OF 2015)
as the delay is concerned, we are inclined to condone the delay of 20 days. Hence, civil application filed for condonation of delay is allowed and disposed of in terms of prayer clause (a).
[ P.R. BORA, J.] [ V.M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
3/3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 20 days in filing the Family Court Appeal can be condoned given the applicant's explanation.
Whether the respondent's objections regarding unexplained delay and false averments regarding settlement talks are sufficient to reject the condonation application.
Sou. Neha Abhijit Mangudkar
Mr. Abhijit Bharat Mangudkar
V.M. Kanade
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
